Catch App Store rejection risks before you submit.
AppReady runs a blocker-first readiness audit for mobile teams preparing iOS submission or resubmission. We check privacy, account deletion, IAP, reviewer access, QA evidence, and repo/config risks before Apple reviews your build.
Takes 5–7 minutes. Read-only repo, zip upload, TestFlight, or limited-evidence review available. No approval guarantee; we identify avoidable rejection risks.
Most App Review delays are avoidable.
Founders usually do not need another vague checklist. They need to know which issues can cause rejection, stall review, or embarrass the launch.
SDKs collect data, but privacy policy, App Privacy labels, or disclosures do not match.
No demo credentials, empty test account, email verification wall, or unclear setup steps.
Restore purchase, subscription state, entitlement, or external payment language is missing or confusing.
Apps with account creation need an accessible in-app account deletion initiation path.
Privacy manifests, signatures, Info.plist permissions, or third-party SDK disclosures are incomplete.
No real-device TestFlight evidence for first launch, login, offline state, keyboard/forms, or critical flows.
What the audit checks
The review is practical: identify launch blockers, capture evidence, and hand the team a fix order they can execute.
Repo / technical configuration
- Info.plist permission descriptions
- PrivacyInfo.xcprivacy and SDK manifest risk
- Staging/debug endpoints and exposed config
- Push notification and deep-link configuration
App Store review readiness
- Privacy/support URLs and App Privacy label risk
- Account deletion path and policy consistency
- Reviewer notes, demo credentials, and test data
- Metadata, screenshots, age rating, and sensitive categories
Monetization / IAP
- StoreKit or subscription visibility
- Restore purchase path
- Trial/renewal/cancellation language
- External payment and entitlement risks
QA evidence
- Real-device TestFlight evidence
- First launch, login, and core flow pass
- Offline/no-network and error states
- 20-minute crash sanity check where evidence exists
How it works
A narrow, operational flow. No heavy consulting process before you know whether the build is safe to submit.
Submit intake
Share app details, URLs, TestFlight/repo evidence, reviewer access notes, and known risk areas. Do not send production secrets.
We audit risks
We inspect the evidence against App Store review risks, privacy requirements, account deletion, IAP, reviewer access, and QA signals.
Fix + submit
You receive a verdict, blockers, evidence, prioritized fix order, reviewer notes draft, and optional Codex/Cursor prompts.
See the output before you buy.
The report is designed for action, not ceremony: verdict first, then blocker evidence, fix order, reviewer notes, assumptions, and implementation prompts.
AppReady Audit: FitNote AI
Verdict: Do Not Submit
Risk: High
Build: 1.4.2 / 87
- Privacy Policy URL returns 404. Fix before submission.
- Account creation exists, but deletion path is missing.
- Subscriptions detected; Restore Purchases is not visible.
Reviewer notes draft: demo access, subscription state, deletion path, and test instructions.
Built for private app teams.
The biggest objection is justified: you should not hand app access to a random service. The pilot is structured to minimize unnecessary access.
Read-only by default
Use read-only GitHub access, a zip export, TestFlight invite, screenshots, or limited evidence. We do not need production secrets.
Confidential pilot handling
Audit materials are used only for the requested review, kept out of public examples, and can be deleted after delivery on request.
Source-grounded review
Checks are grounded in Apple review expectations, App Privacy labels, account deletion requirements, SDK/privacy manifest risk, and practical launch QA.
Clear boundary
AppReady is not legal advice, a penetration test, or an approval guarantee. It reduces avoidable rejection and launch-readiness risk.
Pilot offer
Start with the sharp wedge: a 24-hour App Store Rejection-Risk Audit for teams close to submission.
Per submission review during the pilot. Scope depends on available evidence and urgency.
Includes
- Submit / Submit After Fixes / Do Not Submit verdict
- Critical blockers with evidence
- High-risk and medium-risk issue list
- Recommended fix order
- Reviewer notes draft
- Codex/Cursor fix prompts where useful
Best fit: React Native / Expo apps preparing first submission, urgent update, or resubmission.
Not a fit: guaranteed approval, legal advice, full enterprise security audit, or Android-only review.
FAQ
Short answers to the objections that usually block founders from requesting a review.
Can you guarantee App Store approval?
No. Anyone promising guaranteed approval is selling certainty they do not control. We identify avoidable rejection risks and help you submit with fewer obvious blockers.
Do you need full repo access?
No. Read-only repo access is useful, but zip upload, TestFlight access, screenshots, URLs, and reviewer notes can support a limited-evidence audit. The report will label assumptions clearly.
What if my app was already rejected?
Good fit. Include the rejection message in intake. The audit focuses on what to fix before resubmission and how to explain the fix to App Review.
Is this legal advice or a security certification?
No. It is an operational readiness audit. Legal, regulated-category, and deep security questions should go to qualified specialists.
Do you support Expo and React Native?
Yes. The pilot is built first for Expo and React Native teams, especially AI-built apps and agencies preparing iOS submission.
Do you review subscriptions and restore purchase?
Yes. We check visible restore-purchase paths, reviewer testability, subscription language, entitlement state evidence, and obvious external-payment risk.
What do I receive after 24 hours?
A Markdown/HTML report with verdict, blockers, risk level, evidence, fix order, reviewer notes draft, and implementation prompts where useful.
Submitting soon? Do not let Apple be your first QA pass.
Get a 24-hour rejection-risk audit before review. Read-only repo, zip upload, TestFlight, or limited-evidence review available.
The email fallback uses the AppReady pilot inbox; intake form submissions remain the primary review queue.